Every public official in New York is required to take an oath of office to: “ ... solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of New York, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of (my office) ... to the best of my ability.”
In addition, under New York's Real Property Tax Law (RPTL), Section 102, and as set forth in the New York state “A Taxpayer's Guide: How to File For A Review of Your Assessment,” as revised in January of 2002, the term “Revaluation (‘reassessment' or ‘update')” is defined as: “A systematic review of the assessments of all locally assessed properties, valued as of the valuation date of the assessment roll containing those assessments, to attain compliance with the standard of assessment (a uniform percentage of value) ... ' (RPTL Section 102).”
Based upon:
1. the grievances filed with the Town of Summer Hill Board of Assessment Review (BAR) by property owners or their representatives,
2. recent correspondence with Town of Summer Hill appointed assessor Heather Garner,
3. the stipulations submitted by said assessor to the BAR for its review and approval, and
4. worst - said assessor's refusal to provide any credible corroboration or documentation to substantiate the per-acre value determinations on which her 2009 reassessments of land values in the Town of Summer Hill are allegedly based, it has become very clear that there are:
1. gross errors and deficiencies in many property inventories in the town,
2. glaring inequities in valuations of innumerable properties within the town,
3. unexplainable and insupportable reductions in the assessments of certain “select” parcels already agreed to by the assessor,
4. unexplainable and uncorrected duplications in the comparable residential sales provided by said assessor to the public for purposes of comparison, and
5. grossly inflated “time-adjusted” comparable sales.
The bottom line: There is nothing uniform or fair or equitable about the 2009 revaluation of properties in the Town of Summer Hill. It violates NYS Real Property Tax Law, and more importantly, the Constitutions of the United States and of New York. The town board should immediately set it aside as a sham and a fraud, especially in light of the current economic depression, and direct that the 2008 Assessment Rolls be reinstated.
Furthermore, as the mechanics of the BAR's grievance process are based on the wholly defective 2009 revaluation, I hereby give notice that I refuse to participate in the fraud by continuing with the deliberation of the grievances, and therefore will abstain from all further voting on the grievances before the BAR.
Mary A. Osgood
Groton
Based upon:
1. the grievances filed with the Town of Summer Hill Board of Assessment Review (BAR) by property owners or their representatives,
2. recent correspondence with Town of Summer Hill appointed assessor Heather Garner,
3. the stipulations submitted by said assessor to the BAR for its review and approval, and
4. worst - said assessor's refusal to provide any credible corroboration or documentation to substantiate the per-acre value determinations on which her 2009 reassessments of land values in the Town of Summer Hill are allegedly based, it has become very clear that there are:
1. gross errors and deficiencies in many property inventories in the town,
2. glaring inequities in valuations of innumerable properties within the town,
3. unexplainable and insupportable reductions in the assessments of certain “select” parcels already agreed to by the assessor,
4. unexplainable and uncorrected duplications in the comparable residential sales provided by said assessor to the public for purposes of comparison, and
5. grossly inflated “time-adjusted” comparable sales.
The bottom line: There is nothing uniform or fair or equitable about the 2009 revaluation of properties in the Town of Summer Hill. It violates NYS Real Property Tax Law, and more importantly, the Constitutions of the United States and of New York. The town board should immediately set it aside as a sham and a fraud, especially in light of the current economic depression, and direct that the 2008 Assessment Rolls be reinstated.
Furthermore, as the mechanics of the BAR's grievance process are based on the wholly defective 2009 revaluation, I hereby give notice that I refuse to participate in the fraud by continuing with the deliberation of the grievances, and therefore will abstain from all further voting on the grievances before the BAR.
Mary A. Osgood
Groton
Citizen
Hot Jobs
New! Off the Menu
The Citizens' Say
Post your comment - click hereThere are 2 comment(s)
Farmer's Gal wrote on Jun 27, 2009 6:33 AM:
Lots of people complain, but then they don't take the steps necessary to do something about it.
BTW, Bill -- my dad uses that same line for his sig file -- that's one way to get it past the auto-filters on the web forum software! "
bill balyszak wrote on Jun 26, 2009 11:00 AM:
And this is a well known fact by EVERYONE who can do something about it but refuse - yes, refuse - to do anything to change the status quo.
What we have here in Cayuga County and NYS are nothing but cesspools of corruption that keep getting bigger and bigger.
And it doesn't matter if someone, like Mary, quotes the laws which have been broken, they - the Towns, Assessors, Cayuga County Director of Property Svcs, CC DA, CC Sheriff, NYS Office of Real Property Services, NYS AG, NYS IG, State Senator Nozzolio and Governor Paterson - will do NOTHING.
Don't believe me? I resigned from the Fleming BAR last year because of the 'after hours' and other shenanigans done by the remaining 4 BAR members - and maybe others.
The above list of organizations and people is who I wrote to and have a 4 inch folder of communications to and from them, in which not one BAR member, Town Supervisor or Council Member, Assessor, etc. even had their hands slapped, much less fined or fired.
However, the battle is not over for me and I hope it's not over for you Mary and others...
Who knows? Maybe some newspaper or TV station will do an investigative story on these and other 'irregularities' and then - maybe, just maybe - someone will do something.
Remember - illigitimi non carborundum. "