Nearly ten years ago, longtime Washington Bullets/Wizards owner Abe Pollin responded to several fan emails on the team's website. One fan asked Pollin why he decided in the mid-1990s to change the team's name from "Bullets" to "Wizards."

Pollin's response

It has been awhile since I have been asked this question. Believe me when I say it was not an easy decision. I won a World Championship under the name Bullets. However, too often during the mid to late ‘90s, I would hear the word “bullets” associated with guns and violence instead of my basketball team. While the name was longstanding, I finally reached a point that I was simply tired of the association between the two. Then, my good friend, Prime Minister Rabin was assassinated in Israel. That was the final straw. It was time to change names. With regard to the name “Wizards,” we held a three-tiered contest to determine a new name. The name “Wizards” was selected by the fans and has adorned our uniforms since that time.

(Emphasis mine.)

I bring up Pollin's comments because it was an example of an owner being proactive and aware of the impact his team's name could have on fans and the community. While I couldn't find any examples of a public outcry against the Washington basketball team because of its name, it didn't matter. The owner of the Bullets — Pollin — decided that the name was no longer appropriate and a new one was necessary. 

It's a shame Daniel Snyder does not have that same kind of awareness.

Snyder is the owner of the Washington Redskins, the city's NFL team. The name of the Washington football team has been scrutinized for years. 

Google "redskin define" and you will find out why. The result is simple: "offensive. An American Indian." It's not a kind term. And it's certainly not appropriate. 

The Wikipedia entry for the word "redskin" provides more information:

"Redskin" is a racial descriptor for Native Americans, the origin of which is disputed. Although by some accounts not originally having negative intent, the term is now defined by dictionaries of American English as "usually offensive", "disparaging", "insulting", "taboo" and is avoided in public usage with the exception of its continued use as a name for sports teams.

While high school teams, including Cooperstown's athletic program, have dumped the nickname, Washington's NFL team has refused to lead by example and change its name. Snyder said in May that the team's name "will never change."

As a society, respect is needed. Some might call it political correctness. But I call it respect. Let's avoid racist and sexist jokes. Let's not bully or harass the vulnerable. Let's not use hateful language that might not be offensive to most, but hurts some. Let's ask ourselves, "Is this how we would want to be treated?" 

In the case of the Washington Redskins, the team needs to change its name. Snyder should follow in the footsteps of Pollin and realize that the name isn't appropriate and needs to be altered. Hold a contest, change the name yourself. It doesn't matter. But it's time to retire "Redskins" once and for all.

(7) comments

adamhankins

Hail to the Redskins! I'm with Daniel Snyder on this one--I hope the name never changes.

coach53

It is redicoulous to change the name of the Redskins. I am so sick and tired of liberals wanting to be politically correct. The Redskins are the Redskins.

movedsouth
movedsouth

And I'm sure the kids can no longer play Cowboys and Indians. This PC stuff is out of control.Won't be long before they'll put out semi annual lists of PC terms.

liberal karl
liberal karl

Kids aren't old enough to know better. Argument demolished.

movedsouth
movedsouth

Problem is that we have trying to be PC and it confuses issues. We recently had "permanent immigrants" if they're not actually illegal aliens, who are they? And Native Americans, they're Indians or American Indians. And kids DO know better when they play Cowboys and Indians, because that's proper.

Ryan_Matt

Robert, you used Wikipedia as a source to define the term "Redskin?" That action in itself is enough to discredit not only your entire argument, but your credibility as a journalist. You should know better.

liberal karl
liberal karl

Wikipedia has a reliability and accuracy rating which exceeds that of the Encyclopedia Brittanicca, Ryan. Its information is constantly getting peer-reviewed and updated. You cannot just post false information on it anonymously and not have it removed or challenged.

And we're not talking about a genetics-based medical procedure here or some obscure trivia here. We're talking about a simple racist term. If you're willing to discredit an entire, fact-based argument based upon your incorrect perception of Wikipedia's proven accuracy and reliability, then you're quite foolish, Ryan.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.