AUBURN | Auburn City Manager Doug Selby's latest draft for a proposed 2013-14 budget carries a 2 percent property tax levy increase.

Selby presented his plan to Auburn City Council at its meeting last week. The new draft — a refinement to a version released several weeks ago — comes with less than a month left before the budget needs to be finalized by the end of June. Selby made several refinements to his newest proposal, which identifies eight positions to be cut to find additional savings.

A public hearing on the current budget proposal will be held during this Thursday's City Council meeting.

Selby proposed to cut two upper-level city police positions that are expected to be vacant, due to retirement, this coming fiscal year. Cutting these positions would result in $200,000 of savings, $100,000 for each position, he said.

Four entry-level firefighter positions are currently vacant; Selby proposed that they stay that way for a potential savings of $235,000 in total.

The other two cut positions would be part-time with an estimated savings of $36,000.

Several values were also refined in the most recent budget proposal. The city manager now projects that the proposed increases to parking hours and fees would result in $75,000 in additional revenue as opposed to the original estimate of $150,000.

Selby said it is difficult to estimate just how much the increases in parking would result in additional revenue.

The projected revenue increase from revised codes and building permit feeds was also decreased from $350,000 originally to $200,000 in the latest proposal. Several city councilors have expressed concerns with recent building permit fee proposals, especially residential permit fees.

"We were anticipating a fairly aggressive program," Selby said. "With the council's recent discussion, we're not expecting them to adopt everything."

Gov. Andrew Cuomo's pension smoothing plan is rolled into the budget, which would level out payment contributions the city has to make into the state pension program. The pension smoothing plan has been estimated to result in a total of $1.7 million in potential savings on the budget in the next fiscal year.

City councilors have discussed holding a formal vote on whether or not to keep the plan in the budget. The city manager is working with corporation counsel to make the matter into a resolution, one that could be voted on as early as Thursday, Selby said.

"We're trying to honor that request to provide the opportunity for council to vote on that," he said.

Should the council reject the plan from the budget, the city would have to cover the $1.7 million. Closing that gap would most likely result in a significant cut in services, Selby said.

"It's a difficult time in government for all of us to meet the needs of the people without overwhelming them with fees," he said. "I'd like to see us avoid a dramatic cut in services and I know council would like to as well.

"It would be a challenging issue if we don't use the pension leveling program."

Staff writer Greg Mason can be reached at 282-2239 or Follow him on Twitter @CitizenMason.

(4) comments

Mr bwash

$150,000 worth of forecasted new revenue from parking?

WOW ... That a lot of $

even reforcasted $75K worth of new revenue ... Tat seems awfully high

That doesn't seem possible ... Besides AT Wally's ... I don't see much of anything new to pull folks in to park ...

Mr bwash

These new revenue forecasts will just keep getting dialed down...


How will the savings of not filling four entry level firefighters be offset by overtime paid to existing firefighters. Based on past expenses incurred in overtime iIwould expect the actual costs of these "cuts" will cost extra tax payer dollars as well as creating a problem down the line with experienced firefighters


Here we go, looking at trying to save what amounts to be nickels and dimes possibly at the expense of public safety. Unfortunately those at the AIDA didn't seem to consider the long and short term impacts of their tax revenue give-aways. We're cutting public safety while non-profits who use and depend on those vital services don't seem to be willing to pitch in with at least one even taking the city to court to avoid paying their share. There is room to cut the overhead and there's ways to become more efficient, but keep in mind that for every dollar we don't collect in revenue, another dollar has to be cut from the budget. Cities have too much exempt property and the cost of providing services is going up. Now either those who don't want to pay, start to, or we make major cuts and reorganize our priorities and start picking what we can do without.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.