Appeals court leaves internal leadership question up to the Cayuga Nation

Appeals court leaves internal leadership question up to the Cayuga Nation

Cayuga Nation22.JPG (copy)

The Trading Post on Cayuga Nation property in Seneca Falls prior to Saturday's destruction.

The New York Court of Appeals this week reversed a lower court decision on a lawsuit between the federally recognized leadership of the Cayuga Nation and members of its traditional government, saying the leadership dispute that dates back more than a decade is outside the state's jurisdiction.

The lawsuit was brought in 2017 by the Cayuga Nation Council under Clint Halftown against members of the traditional council — referred to by the court as the Jacobs Council for defendant William Jacobs, but also known previously as the Unity Council — shortly after the Bureau of Indian Affairs accepted Halftown as the Nation's federally recognized representative.

The lawsuit sought to force the members or supporters of the traditional government to turn over nation-owned properties under their control in Seneca County and to pay damages for the "takeover" of said properties.

However, the Court of Appeals has now said that the BIA's recognition of Halftown applied only for the purpose of accepting federal funds, and that the question of leadership still needs to be decided in accordance with traditional law rather than the state or federal government.

In a press release, Halftown welcomed the decision, saying the Nation would internally settle the dispute, as the court suggested, through its internal police force.

The Nation established the police force last year. This summer, the BIA directed Seneca Falls Chief of Police Stuart Peenstra that the Nation "may enforce its own criminal laws against Indians within the boundaries of its Reservation."

"When the Cayuga Nation brought this action, it did not have a tribal court or a law enforcement authority to enforce the Nation's criminal laws. It now does, and the Nation will be turning to its own law enforcement and court system to bring these offenders to justice," Halftown said.

However, Joseph Heath, an attorney representing members of the traditional government, questioned Halftown's characterization of the decision as a victory.

Heath instead described it as "100% in our favor and a very significant loss for Halftown," adding that it was "puzzling" for Halftown to welcome the decision.

"They said very clearly that the BIA cannot and did not crown him leader or chairman or whatever he wants to call himself," Heath told The Citizen in a phone interview Wednesday. 

The decision, Heath said, affirmed that the Great Law of Peace, the traditional, oral law of the nations of the Haudenosaunee or Iroquois Confederacy based on consensus decision making and clan mothers, still governs the Cayuga Nation and its leadership decisions.

Heath said the court's recognition of the Great Law, which included the use of its original Haudenosaunee name, was also an important legal win for traditional nations in general.

Regarding Halftown's statement that the Nation's police force would handle the dispute, Heath said he was uncertain by how things would proceed, but said an agreement between Halftown's council and a Pennsylvania jail to house offenders in particular was "of grave concern."

"We don't know what the rules are, we don't know where the rules are, we're entering a Never-Neverland is the best way to describe it," Heath said.

Staff writer Ryan Franklin can be reached at (315) 282-2252 or Follow him on Twitter @RyanNYFranklin.


Get local news delivered to your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News