Skip to main contentSkip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.

NY bill would raise gasoline tax by 55 cents per gallon

  • Updated
  • 0
Gas pump

Filling up car with gas. 

Legislation backed by 23 members of the state Senate could result in a 26% increase in natural gas heating costs and a 55 cent-a-gallon increase in gasoline taxes.

The Climate And Community Investment Act (S.4264A) was introduced in early February by state Sen. Kevin Parker, D-Brooklyn, and assigned to the Senate's Environmental Conservation Committee on March 22. The bill would impose a carbon tax of $55 per ton of fossil fuel emissions from all sources, including schools, factories and on the use of gasoline.

More details about the proposal came out during a Senate public hearing held Tuesday, including a Business Council of New York State analysis showing the impact on the natural gas industry and gasoline.

Kenneth Pokalsky, vice president of the Business Council of New York State, tied his group's analysis to a $15 billion estimate of taxes and fees raised by the Climate and Community Investment Act. The council estimates natural gas would account for $4.2 billion of the $15 billion in fees, with natural gas costs projected to increase 26% based on historical natural gas use trends. Gasoline taxes would have to increase 55 cents a gallon to meet residential transportation segment's goals in the legislation.

Sen. James Gaughran, D-Syosset, was among the legislators who spoke during Tuesday's public hearing and blanched at the projected increase in gasoline taxes. Gaughran's district is dependent on automobiles, and Gaughran noted many of his constituents can't afford either an electric vehicle or such a hefty increase in gasoline taxes.

"I'd like to see a provision that makes it really clear, particularly for people who are driving automobiles and they have to drive so many miles – there are people who will drive 20,000 miles a year just for commuting purposes only in my district. Let's come up with a salary," Gaughran said. "Let's figure out what the maximum salary is to qualify for it and then give these folks an exemption so that they're not unduly subsidizing this program. We can tailor some sort of a rebate program specifically for people like that as it relates to automobile users who have no alternatives at this time."

Environmental advocates pointed Gaughran and other legislators to debate provisions in the Climate and Community Investment Act that they say protect low- to moderate-income state residents. Eligible taxpayers would automatically be enrolled in the Household and Small Business Energy Rebate Program, though the legislation states rebates would only be paid if there is enough money in the fund. The rebate would apply to 60% of state households. Benefits could include transit vouchers for public mass transit, utility assistance or a weatherization grant or "other forms that comply with this subdivision." Lawmakers asked pointed questions about how the gasoline tax rebate would be structured, but environmental advocates had no firm answers for them other than taxpayers would be automatically enrolled in the rebate program if they qualify and that people could save money in the long run with more efficient vehicles and heating systems in their homes.

"I've heard the $15 billion number thrown out a number of times. That's a big number. In our analysis the tax on natural gas alone would be $4.2 billion," Pokalsky said. "That would be a 26% increase in the cost. The cost of gasoline would be $2.3 billion, about 55 cents per gallon. For those who aren't getting rebates those are significant costs that would have to be absorbed."

Many environmental groups support the creation of a carbon tax to spur businesses and individuals to change their behavior and purchasing choices. Higher gas prices are designed to spur more sales of electric vehicles and use of mass transit. Ryan Madden, sustainability organizer of the Long Island Progressive Coalition Citizen Action on Long Island, testified that lawmakers shouldn't assume fossil fuel companies will pass the gasoline tax proposed in the legislation on to consumers.

"We're assuming these costs are being passed on as a natural law when they are going to be making decisions for that on their own bottom line without us first asking how are they going to prioritize how much their CEO and top management gets paid," Madden said. "So it feels like a really important reframe that the burden is not on all of us to ask this. What are these polluters — Exxon Mobil's CEO got a raise up to $23 million alone in 2019. I don't think that's necessary. I feel like that's an important reframe."

The Biden administration says jobs will fix the climate crisis.  "Our plans are ambitious, but we are America," President Biden said. "We're bold." President Biden says his plan will require retraining thousands of people to retrofit housing, build solar panels, wind turbines and more. His goal: 10 million clean energy jobs. Many of the workers filling those jobs would come from the hundreds of thousands who currently work in the fossil fuel industry.   "We've lost 10 million jobs in the COVID-19 recession," Robert E. Scott, senior economist at Economic Policy Institute, said. "We need to make those jobs up."  The president has proposed a $2 trillion climate plan over the next four years, but it's probably only the tip of the iceberg. "The Biden plan is just a down payment on a conversion to clean energy products," Scott said. "It's going to take about 30 years by the best estimates I've seen. It gets spending ramped up, but we're going to have to increase it further and sustain it over that 30 year period in order to get the conventional energy supplies out of our economy."Right now, the United States depends on fossil fuels for about 80 percent of its energy.  Studies have shown that burning coal, crude oil or natural gas, can produce large amounts of carbon dioxide trapping heat in the atmosphere causing global warming, a sign of human-caused climate change. "We have to do something about it and that it is literally a threat to human life."Sen. Bob Casey, a Democrat, supports Republican initiatives to continue fracking a major industry in his home state of Pennsylvania. Newsy asked: "Do you think it will be possible for people to transition from working in fossil fuel to renewable energy?""It's going to require a determined effort to provide people the opportunity and the training," Casey told Newsy. "Everybody understands we need to reduce our carbon footprint on the planet."Congressman Kelly Armstrongs family has devoted their entire livelihood into the oil and gas industry.  "The reality is, is these jobs don't exist," Armstrong said. "We need energy. We have to have it. And to say that we can do it all with solar and wind under current technologies is just simply not true." Meanwhile, the demand for solar power has been on the rise. "I know a lot of those guys that were on the pipelines and they are hard, hard workers and that's exactly what we need in this industry," Ches Heitmeyer, owner of Solar Sam in Columbia, Missouri, said. The bottom line, America needs to invest before it can run on just renewable energy. "We're not going to eliminate the oil and gas industry, for example, overnight," Scott said. "Those jobs will still be there. We will still need these fuels in the transition."   


Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News